Tag Archives: controversy

Obama Clock

As Hot Air puts it, “Sick of Obama? There’s an app for that.”

On the iPhone, but not on my Android cell.

C’mon, folks, we need this ported over to the Motorola Atrix and others!

UPDATE: Unpatriot Acts?

The war on civilians, aka citizens, with cameras.

Watch the video. It will explain a lot.

UPDATE: War on photographing police continues:

In its ruling, which lets Simon Glik continue his lawsuit, the US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in Boston said the way Glik was arrested and his phone seized under a state wiretapping law violated his First and Fourth Amendment rights.

Full court opinion here and more info at his link.

Reminiscent of Classic WKRP Episode

Turkeys don’t fly.

But Romney changed his mind about global warming, er, climate change. We don’t cause it. Whatever.

“They’re dropping to the ground like sacks of wet cement. One went through a windshield of a parked car!”

Video at the link. You never saw this on WKRP.

UPDATE: Reworking Rewriting History

At our own White House official website.

Who would have guessed such attitudes would be so brazen, so despicable?

Wow. Just – wow.

UPDATE: AHA !! Now we know the real reason. It involves (mistaken) White House policy versus legal (?) actions and rewriting their website content to get them in synch. Of course, the Supreme Court has better information on what they should do instead. Way to go, Chief Justice Roberts.

But if the guys at the White House thought they could get away with this, they didn’t read footnote 10 of Chief Justice John Roberts’s opinion for the court in Arizona Free Enterprise Club’s Freedom Club PAC v. Bennett (citations and extraneous quotation marks omitted): “Prior to oral argument in this case, the Citizens Clean Elections Commission’s Web site stated that ‘The Citizens Clean Elections Act was passed by the people of Arizona in 1998 to level the playing field when it comes to running for office.’ The Web site now says that ‘The Citizens Clean Elections Act was passed by the people of Arizona in 1998 to restore citizen participation and confidence in our political system.’ ”

The court had previously held that preventing corruption was a “compelling state interest” that justified some restrictions on political speech. But as the chief justice noted, “we have repeatedly rejected the argument that the government has a compelling state interest in ‘leveling the playing field’ that can justify undue burdens on political speech.” The commission, a state government agency, was altering its public statements to bring them into line with its legal defense–precisely what the White House is now doing.

Belweather Day in WI Tuesday

Tomorrow.

For Whom Will the Bell Toll???

RECALL ELECTION 18th SENATE: Clerks expecting heavy turnout

NRA Sues DOJ

http://video.foxnews.com/v/1095760427001/fierce-battle-over-gun-rights

D.C. HoneyBadgers

Thanks to Hot Air, I don’t know whether to laugh, or cry.

You find out, you let me know.

Tells It Like It Is

Can’t say that I disagree with Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online. Not at all.
I notice what the media does not, also. That they are terribly one-sided.
Hardly what I would call profesionally objective journalists interested in truth and disseminating it for us all to acknowledge it, learn and make things better.
Also, they are not, dare I say – “fair and balanced.”

I have to admit, I think Jonah’s response is the same as mine.
Too bad. But it is the price paid for expanding one’s vision beyond what it used to be.

My favorite website, Don Surber, has more on this. Involves Time Magazine, too.

VP Calls Us Terrorists

And later, denies he said that word.

What do you say now, Joe? That this debt deal isn’t a deal? Or, is it? Does it depend on the definition of is? Or was?

Make up your mind, Joe. We are watching. And remembering. Certainly until November 2012.

Swift Boated Again

Ben Smith (POLITICO) has a short article concerning a Swift Boat veteran.

I’m sure John Kerry won’t be happy about it.