Category Archives: Ethics

We Have Met The Enemy

But it is not Sheriff Joe Arpaio.

This man is doing the job the entire Federal Government refuses to do.
He has a price on his head per the Mexican drug cartel.

And now the DOJ is going to sue him.

I mentioned this to Sean & Frank on WCBM one morning not too long ago. That the guvmint was also sending a message to the county sheriffs that participate in the 287G ICE program. Besides sending that message to Arizona’s Governor about their newly crafted SB 1070.

(I had no idea I was so prophetic at the time.)

The Administration’s message? “Don’t bother the illegals.”

Well, come November 2, 2010, we aren’t going to bother re-electing any incumbents.

We need to divide the government, folks. Single party control is not good for us.

Stupid Is As Stupid Does

Pete Stark.

Why is this idiot still in Congress?

A Very Important Question

And this November 2nd (even September 14th for us in Maryland) will tell us if we have a chance at making corrections.

Here’s the question: Is the American Middle Class Disappearing?

I encourage you to read the post via the above link. The statistics are simple enough to give us all the sense of why it is extremely important to turn back recent legislation that will raise our expenses and taxes to an intolerable level.

We think it’s bad now? We do NOT want to wait any longer, or our future is not just doubtful – it will be painful.

Remember November

Because Donald Berwick (and who else in our Government?) would prefer you did not.

So he can emulate UK’s NHS to save us money.

Your life, or someone’s you love, depends on it.

Mexico Drug Cartel – $1M Bounty for Sheriff’s Head

Even for a watered down bill (SB 1070) going into effect, the Mexican drug cartel seems to be feeling its oats.

This won’t end well.

Re-Election Fears?

Are the Dems trying to placate us by giving up two of their own?

My answer:

It’s Too Late to Apologize.

UPDATE: Overkill

An out of control tort system leads to the possibility of a jury award that would “wipe the company off the face of the earth.”

Not exactly what I would call an equitable situation. Particularly since “… there was never any claim from any patient that there’d (sic) been harmed or put in danger.”

And also there is this – “… some 32,000 people — patients/residents and healthcare workers alike — would lose their heatlhcare (sic) facilities and jobs.”

This isn’t justice people.


UPDATE (in response to a commenter’s question, a Google search provides the answers)

Frivolous Lawsuits:

1
2
3
4
5

Thanks for asking.

P.S. Nowhere in my post above do I state that was a frivolous lawsuit, in fact, nowhere in the referred article post uses that term either.

P.P.S. To further eliminate any confusion, my focus is not on the suit so much as the possibility of such an enormous award that will no doubt destroy a business – and is that a singularly good reason in every case? Is this a mistake that can be remedied? If so, how does erasing a business solve the problem? And how on earth does awarding such amounts serve anyone? The victims are going to get all of it? Doubtful. Even if that were possible, taxes would hit very hard. And then there’s the infighting among the recipients. No further good comes from this.

UPDATE: Amnesty Without Congress

Gee, it sounds like the guvmint trying to make Congress irrelevant.

Since when it is someone else’s job to enact legislation????

What also comes to mind is this is a way to try and keep this OUT OF OUR VIEW!

UPDATE: Apparently, the GOP lawmakers want an explanation. Well so do I.

UPDATE: Obamacare’s Eyechart

You think I’m kidding?

Guess again.

It’s worse than Glenn Beck’s chart from awhile back.

UPDATE: I knew I saw this before. heh heh.

UPDATED: Bypass the Electoral College??

Massachusetts wants to.
And, so far, five other states did. (Guess who was first?)

Good idea?? You know what this means don’t you?

It would mean that their states’ electoral votes may be awarded to a candidate who did not win statewide.

Still think it’s a good idea? I do not.

Here’s the status so far, state-by-state.

UPDATE: Here is a very good post on the Electoral College subject.

Oops. Looks like Massachusetts passed it.

Now I have a question for the entire country. In view of this seeming trend, how would states that DO NOT have such high density populations, like these that do have – New York, California and others, feel when the overriding concern for becoming President means the only places they have to go are the major cities? Still think your vote has the same weight?

Quote –

“What we are submitting is the idea that the president should be selected by the majority of people in the United States of America,” Senator James B. Eldridge, an Acton Democrat, said before the Senate voted to enact the bill.

Under the new bill, he said, “Every vote will be of the same weight across the country.”

Mark my words, it is a facade, people. Wake up!