Tag Archives: anti-business

Another Job Killing Policy

Thank the POTUS, folks. Remember, coal is for his stocking.

Not your furnace. And not for working folk.

What a dolt.

Backlash In Obama’s Backyard

Chicago.

You won’t see this protest on the news.

But you can read about it, and see the pictures, right here.

Smokin Joe

No, not the boxer.

The nimrod from Delaware. (That’s a figure of speech, there, Veep.)

Gonna strangle who are you?

Not only should the budget be balanced, you should be making it SMALLER!!!!!!!

39K Job Loss in September

“The median of estimates from 38 economists surveyed by Reuters for the ADP Employer Services report, jointly developed with Macroeconomic Advisers LLC, was for a rise of 24,000 private-sector jobs in September.”

Wait a minute, what?

Read for yourself.

Head Whiner In Charge

Apparently didn’t like the honest feedback about his policies from a businessman in the room.

The Big Baby. Taking his toys back, I guess.

Fighting To Keep Bush Tax Cuts

So far. So good.

McConnell vows to introduce tax-freeze bill

Republicans pledge to fight to preserve Bush-era tax cuts

Theater in the extreme. Just before elections. Get the popcorn ready.

2010 Deficit 2nd Largest in 65 Years

$91 Billion shortfall in August. This year. Last month.

How’s that Recovery Summer working there, Congress? POTUS? Anybody?

How Much Bad News Costs On the Gulf Oil Spill

Let’s find out, shall we?

WASHINGTON – The federal government hired a New Orleans man for $18,000 to appraise whether news stories about its actions in the Gulf oil spill were positive or negative for the Obama administration, … there’s more … far more

Feeling Our Pain

That’s what the Prez said alright.

Horse hockey.

New Jobs Killer

Approximately 150,000 jobs may be on the line. Almost immediately. If the following tax hikes pass.

” … President Obama explicitly targeted the industry for two massive tax hikes. First, he’d ban oil and gas companies from using the “Section 199” tax credit, a measure for domestic manufacturers enacted in 2004 to boost US employment. (The Senate is set to vote this week on its version of the ban.) Second, he wants to end “dual capacity” protection for US energy firms. ”

I strongly suggest you read the article.

Because it might cost the US $341 billion in lost economic activity and $68 billion in wages over the next nine years.

Read more: