Tag Archives: controversy

First Do No Harm

From a friend, there is a new web address that should be brought to the attention of all Marylanders, in particular, Baltimore County at this time.

First Do No Harm

This involves the upcoming vote in the Baltimore County Council concerning expansion of “rights” for transgenders and cross-dressers.

I strongly recommend you follow the link and learn more on this topic, and voice your opinion. Loudly.

This has the inevitable potential for driving a wedge into common sense and practical, ethical, family values. Be sure you understand the big picture here.

Advertisements

He Should Have Kept His Mouth Shut

But no, the White House opened it wide and condemned the killing of the Iranian Nuclear scientist.

Presidential Candidate Rick Santorum was right. Zippy should have zipped it.

Your Money Becomes Theirs

Heard of Solyndra, right? Apparently, more “green” companies are about to tank.
And what’s more, the Administration has had $2.4 billion in hand and planned for use involving these extra upcoming failures.

Now, what do you think about that? Criminal? Or truly incompetent at managing finances?

Either way, the wrong people are in charge within our Government. Remember November 2012.

IDs Required But For Voting

There have been prior versions floating around, but I wanted to update the list to see where this goes and if it grows “legs.”

If anyone has extra information to add, please be so kind to let me know. I will be happy to update and re-post it.

AG Holder a Betting Man

That’s how this Hot Air article portrays him. Nevertheless, this article is an excellent read and blockquotes this tidbit within theirs:

The 1965 Voting Rights Act was created to combat the systematic disenfranchisement of minorities, especially in Southern states with a history of discrimination. But the Justice position is a lead zeppelin, contradicting both the Supreme Court and the Department’s own precedent. In 2005, Justice approved a Georgia law with the same provisions and protections of the one Mr. Holder nixed for South Carolina. In 2008, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in Crawford v. Marion County Election Board that an Indiana law requiring photo ID did not present an undue burden on voters.

But betting man? Holder? I’m surprised has hasn’t folded his hand. He really should.

Read the whole article as Hot Air’s Ed Morrissey points out that the photo-id established by Indiana and others are provided to the applicant for free.

As It Should Be

And was done.

Eric Bolling Boots Atheist Off His Show

For denigrating Jesus Christ’ name.

Moronic Twist

Coming from SoS Hillary Clinton, “gay rights are human rights and human rights are gay rights.” She said this to the United Nations as a consequence of a memorandum President Obama issued earlier today directing all agencies to “promote and protect the human rights of LGBT persons.”

So where are your Rose Law firm papers, Hillary?