Not here, though. In France.
If our administration is trying to “europeanize” us, does this mean we will find the same thing for ourselves??? Hhhmm?
Not here, though. In France.
If our administration is trying to “europeanize” us, does this mean we will find the same thing for ourselves??? Hhhmm?
Posted in Constitution, Economy, Energy, Ethics, Global Warming
Tagged Transparency, Truth
Just in time for the state of … state of … what?
Votes, that is. To create a bipartisan deficit committee.
Gee, one would think we wouldn’t need that – if the Senate JUST DID THEIR JOBS!
All the more reason to replace the bulk of them.
Particularly since they aren’t really trying to “save their phoney baloney jobs.”
Canada to UN: No. We will not fund terrorism.
So, the Dems want to ask us questions?
I agree with one of the commenters:Do you trust Obama and the Democrats?
Do you believe in loss of freedom? I don’t.
Do you think wealth redistribution solves anything? I don’t.
Do you think federal government should take over state governments? I don’t.
Do you think our federal government should change our free enterprise system? I don’t.
POTUS wants to freeze discretionary spending? Really?
On just a SMALL PART of the total federal budget?
But the real question is, are the WH parties going to stop, and will “date night” be at the local McDonald’s?
Hhhmm. Updates at Hot Air on this topic
Posted in Deficit, Economy, Politics
Tagged controversy, Incompetence, Promise, Transparency
This article lists those on the House Rules Committee.
If you agree on the need for this vote, call them to convince them to bring it out of committee and onto the legislature floor for a vote.
And we thought it wasn’t much.
Oh, wait … that’s what the Democrats claim.
Now where are we going to come up with the money? Hhhmm?
It is long past due to clean out Congress.
Is Speaker Pelosi saying this is over? Or?
UPDATEx1: Rumor? Or, was this “fixing to pass Obamacare anyway” being discussed over the weekend?
Updatex2: And here are the 23 that need to be contacted in order to nail the coffin shut.
Updatex3: Yes indeed. Let it go.
How about anyone else?
Treating Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab as a criminal instead of as a terrorist?
Reading him his Miranda rights?
Well, at least the Washington Post gets it. How about our leaders? Hhmm?
In a prior post of mine, I thought something else may have been going on.
Perhaps WaPo is right.