Pressed For Answers

Actually, more like – DENIED ANY ANSWERS AT ALL at the Arcadia University event. You know, where the POTUS went to speak about his plan for Healthcare to – a – select – invited – group – of – citizens – with – no – Press – allowed – inside.

By POTUS Security no less.

How’s that Hope And Change working, folks? Still think this is America?

And now, the lighter side. According to CBS, POTUS might have to waterboard the Dems to get HC passed. HEH.

Now. Let’s put this POTUS in proper perspective. He is math challenged. Seriously.

Not The Senate Bill You Are Voting On

With apologies to Obi Wan.

All pretense is gone. Long live the fibbers. … Or not.

Judge Rules On Open-Primary Ballot Measure

The supporters of California Proposition 14 are pleased, but not the other side.

The supporters found out about the lawsuit by the California School Employees Union by accident.

Read the whole thing. Considering how things spread from California eastward, I wonder how this will affect the rest of the country.

Besides, why is the CSEU so interested in this?

Land Grab

And what, pray tell, is the reason for this?

More than a dozen pristine landscapes, wildlife habitats and scenic rivers in 11 Western states, some larger than Rhode Island and Delaware combined, are under consideration by the Obama administration to become America’s newest National Monuments — a decision the administration can make unilaterally without local input or congressional approval.

Ramming Legislation We Do Not Want Or Need

Let’s see now, POTUS is going to be in St. Louis tomorrow to push his agenda in a closed to the general public meeting with select invited citizens.

Is this how our taxpayer money is to be used now? To speak not to us, directly, about such a major change to our economy and personal health care? I want my money back.

The next ramming event is scheduled for November 2, 2010. And it is our turn.

Vote on HealthCare Maybe 16th

It could be as early as the 16th, but likely this month according to various sources.
This newly re-crafted 2,000+ page bill is likely to add back in support for abortion.

My message is – scrap it. Either start fresh, or not at all.

Your Rights Are Now Suspended

[Ed: This is a recently received email. I thought it necessary to share with you. The advice given within the email does not necessarily agree with my own.]
…………………
A few months ago, the National Association for Gun Rights first broke this incredible tale out of Shreveport, Louisiana.

At the time, no other gun rights organization had touched the story. But when we tracked down the victim for an interview, we couldn’t believe what we heard, and we immediately sent out a nationwide alert.

The story went viral overnight.

If this tale of government abuse moves you, send it to a friend or family member to get the word out.


Welcome to Shreveport: Your rights are now suspended.
According to Cedric Glover, mayor of Shreveport, Louisiana, his cops “have a power that [. . .] the President of these Unites States does not have”: His cops can take away your rights.

And would you like to guess which rights he has in mind?

Just ask Shreveport resident Robert Baillio, who got pulled over for having two pro-gun bumper stickers on the back of his truck — and had his gun confiscated.

While the officer who pulled him over says Baillio failed to use his turn signal, the only questions he had for Baillio concerned guns: Whether he had a gun, where the gun was, and if he was a member of a pro-gun organization.

No requests for a driver’s licence, proof of insurance, or vehicle registration — and no discussion of a turn signal.

Accordingly, Baillio told the officer the truth, which led the police officer to search his car without permission and confiscate his gun.

However, not only does Louisiana law allow residents to drive with loaded weapons in their vehicles, but Mr. Baillio possessed a concealed carry license!

What does such behavior demonstrate, other than transparent political profiling — going so far as to use the infamous Department of Homeland Security report on “Americans of a rightwing persuasion” as a how-to guidebook, no less?

Mr. Baillio made no secret of his political affiliations: An American flag centers a wide flourish of pro-freedom stickers and decals on his back windshield.

In fact, when Baillio asked the officer if everyone he pulls over gets the same treatment, the officer said no and pointed to the back of his truck.

Baillio phoned Mayor Glover to complain about this “suspension of rights” only to find that his city’s morbidly obese “commander in chief” was elated at the story: According to Glover, Baillio got “served well, protected well, and even got a consideration that maybe [he] should not have gotten.”

Thankfully, Mr. Baillio recorded a good bit of that phone call. You can watch a video with the transcriptions here. I’ve reproduced a chunk of the call below:

Baillio: (in the context of being asked about the presence of a gun) Well, I answered that question honestly, and he disarmed me.

Glover: Which would be an appropriate and proper action, sir. The fact that you gave the correct answer — it simply means that you did what it is you were supposed to have done, and that is to give that weapon to the police officer so he could appropriately place it in a place where it would not be a threat to you, to him, or to anyone in the general public.

[. . .]

Glover: My direction to you is that, had you chosen not to properly identify the fact that you had a weapon and directed that officer to where that weapon was located; had you been taken from the vehicle, and the officer, in the interest of his safety, chose to secure you in a safe position, and then looked, found, and determined that you did, in fact, have a weapon…then, sir, you would have faced additional, [inaudible], and more severe criminal sanctions.

Baillio: So what you’re saying is: I give up all my rights to keep and bear arms if I’m stopped by the police: Is that correct?

Glover: Sir, you have no right, when you have been pulled over by a police officer for a potential criminal offense [which would be what?! – DB] to stand there with your weapon at your side in your hand [Baillio’s weapon was nowhere near his side or his hand, and Glover knew that. – DB] because of your second amendment rights, sir. That does not mean at that point your second amendment right has been taken away; it means at that particular point in time, it has been suspended.

Will Grigg from ProLibertate, an excellent freedom blog, has this to say:

According to Glover, a police officer may properly disarm any civilian at any time, and the civilian’s duty is to surrender his gun — willingly, readily, cheerfully, without cavil or question.

From Glover’s perspective, it is only when firearms are in the hands of people other than the state’s uniformed enforcers/oppressors that they constitute a threat, not only to the public and those in charge of exercising official violence but also to the private gun owner himself.

NAGR spoke with Mr. Baillio, and he told us that he’s in the process of securing the official procedures and codes for firearm handling and private property confiscation for the Shreveport police department.

So far, the city has been half-heartedly cooperating with him.

“I felt sick,” Baillio told NAGR. “My uncles didn’t die for this country so I could surrender my rights like a wimp. I felt terrible. I was just thinking of all that my family has done for freedom in this nation — including dying — and here they are disarming me at a traffic stop.”

What to do?

1. Read Luke’s commentary here, and participate in the discussion by leaving a comment.
2. Send this around. This kind of behavior cannot go unchecked.
3. Call Mayor Glover’s office to complain: (318) 673-5050.

I’ll leave you with one last consideration. As a licensed firearms instructor in charge of a hundred different students every month, I’m often asked if citizens should voluntarily inform police officers of the presence of a firearm during a routine traffic stop.

While different states have different laws, my answer for Colorado citizens is an emphatic “No”: Colorado law doesn’t require you to volunteer that kind of information, and this case in Louisiana proves why, if at all possible, you should never invite trouble by doing so.

For Liberty,
Dudley Brown
Executive Director
National Association for Gun Rights

Unwavering POTUS Immigration Bill Support

So he says.

The basis of a bill would include a path toward citizenship for the 10.8 million people living in the U.S. illegally. Citizenship would not be granted lightly, the White House said. Undocumented workers would need to register, pay taxes and pay a penalty for violating the law. Failure to comply might result in deportation.

Really? Deportation?

Here’s my question. If and when they become Americans does this mean they will no longer do the work that Americans won’t do?

How about eVerify? Is the administration going to use that? Oh, and what’s the business this bill is going to include funding for improved border security? Really? Sure about that?

In Rare Form

The real world view, as expressed by Dan Riehl – in a most direct and blunt description of the nuclear option and what it means.

Now he knows how the rest of us feel about this problem as dictated by the President.

Oh, and let’s not forget. Congress, too. Most of them anyway. But not all.

Mikulski Now For Filibuster Reform

First, a little bit of history:

1997
Senate failed to end a Democratic filibuster designed to force direct votes on campaign finance legislation.

2006
Justice Alito Nomination (check here and here)

Now. Let’s look at WHY Senator Mikulski is now FOR filibuster reform.
2010
Bills approved under reconciliation cannot be blocked via filibuster and need just a bare 51-vote majority to win passage.

Both Maryland Senators are FOR a single payer healthcare system.

Ask yourself – what will become of YOUR current insurance carrier down the road.
And how long, or short, will that time be?