Category Archives: Voting

Voting Systems in MA

This is very serious. Particularly for this coming Tuesday

Speaking for myself, this is new information for me and I can’t say I am too pleased about it. I recommend that you read the entire article and especially watch the embedded video.

I leave it to you to determine your level of trust. Mine, unfortunately, is shaken to the core. And I am an electrical engineer (Bach. Sci.) and computer programmer/user (M.S.).

My questions are: How widespread, in how many sates, is this problem? And why is this allowed to continue?

UPDATE: Turbocharged Motor Voter

What the Dems know that we don’t: Universal Voter Registration

Do you know anyone NOT registered to vote?
Are you registered to vote? No? Well you may soon will be, without your knowledge.

“In January, Chuck Schumer and Barney Frank will propose universal voter registration. What is universal voter registration? It means all of the state laws on elections will be overriden by a federal mandate. The feds will tell the states: ‘take everyone on every list of welfare that you have, take everyone on every list of unemployed you have, take everyone on every list of property owners, take everyone on every list of driver’s license holders and register them to vote regardless of whether they want to be…”

UPDATE: During a luncheon meeting with my campaign manager and treasurer, we discussed this tidbit of upcoming legislation. We have some legitimate concerns about this that I think others may need to know, in case you may not have come to the same points. First, if such wide classes of people are plugged into voter lists – what will be their party affiliation, since those people won’t know this is being done for them and without their knowledge? Second, how will these people find out about their voting eligibility status change? Some folks deliberately dropped off the voting rolls because they fear being called for jury duty, or simply because of no longer voting (in some/most/ all states, inactive voting can result in being purged from the rolls).

Or, is this simply the case that the party (!) interested in mandating this Universal Voter Registration (over the objection of states, I would presume) wants to have contact addresses (locations) to embellish their means to drive voting statistics?

Responsible people (and Candidates) want to know. Myself in particular, because I have my doubts about the honesty and integrity behind this push by (at least) Senators Schumer and Frank.

Special Election Massachusetts

Republican Scott Brown is an opponent to Democrat Coakely in a special election scheduled for January 16th in 2010.

This election is to fill the seat that Sen. Ted Kennedy held.

To see why this could be very important, read this Examiner article.

Send him a contribution if you can.

Ignition.

Blast off. Call today. Fire up your phones.

Before tonight.

Bribes R Us vote tonight.

Blow that Whistle

Ballot Fraud? SEIU? Who knew?

Oh. Yeah. Andrew does. Now, you do.

Simple Math

Speaking as an election judge for the last several cycles, I have come to know that a good turnout of voters is about 35 percent for the precinct that I worked.

That means 35 percent of all registered voters within one area.

What it also means is that there is nearly TWICE as many voters (who did vote) that have not bothered to vote AT ALL. For whatever their reasons.

It is entirely possible that the upcoming elections next year can be winnable, by us, if we can convince those to come out and vote their conscience. It would signify the end of voter apathy, which – I think – we have reached now.

Think about that. Deeply. Seriously. Then contact the FBI – your Friends, Brothers and In-laws – to come to the polls next year and vote their heart out.

(This has been an unpaid political announcement and will be repeated in time for the 2010 elections.)

The Upcoming Financial Picture

Well, it seems the Heritage Foundation has come out with their analysis based on H.R. 3200 and the Affordable Health Choices Act. Both contain a mandate that one has to play or pay a fine (if they don’t play into it). About that, this appears to be the first time in our history that individuals who do NOTHING will be taxed (fined, call it what you will) for not selecting health insurance for themselves.

Not to mention the fact that there is another tidbit buried in H.R. 3200 which gives the UAW another $10B – which amounts to a third bailout in less than a year.

And what chance does Congress have to take on and consider passing H.R. 2550, a Republican effort towards reform that calls for increased competition beyond state borders – including tort reform? (Needless to say, Howard Dean is quoted as saying that the reason tort reform isn’t in these 1,000+ pages of the health care reform such as H.R. 3200 is because Congress doesn’t want to make enemies of trial lawyers.)

So what to do between now and next September and November in 2010? Wait for their votes and then we vote? I wonder what the results will be?